[IO]
Internet Oracle
7 Nov 2024 home : about : create : digests : bestofs : specials : priests 1:34:02 GMT

Internet Oracularities #1609

If you've registered, you may vote on this digest using the vote buttons below each Oracularity. Be sure to rate each one.

Goto:
1609, 1609-01, 1609-02, 1609-03, 1609-04, 1609-05, 1609-06, 1609-07, 1609-08, 1609-09, 1609-10


Internet Oracularities #1609
Compiled-By: Steve Kinzler <steve@kinzler.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 07:33:29 -0500 (EST)

To find out all about the Internet Oracle (TM), including how
to participate, send mail to help@internetoracle.org, or go to
http://internetoracle.org/  ("Internet Oracle" is a trademark of Stephen
B Kinzler.)

Let us know what you like!  Send your ratings of these 10 Oracularities
on an integer scale of 1 ("very bad") to 5 ("very good") with the volume
number to vote@internetoracle.org (probably just reply to this message).
For example:
   1609
   2 1 3 4 3   5 3 3 4 1


1609-01
Selected-By: Klone (aka Daniel Klein)<daniel.v.klein@gmail.com>

The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was:

> Oh great Oracle, who knows how many licks it takes to get to the center
> of a Tootsie Pop,
>
> what time is it in London?

And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

} You're thinking of New London, which is in Connecticut, not Lost London
} which is in Disconnecticut which is why nobody's ever heard of it.
} Regardless, it's too late and you should be asleep. You owe the Oracle
} a new antique Rolex.

Vote: (very bad) 1    2    3    4    5 (very good)


1609-02
Selected-By: Klone (aka Daniel Klein)<daniel.v.klein@gmail.com>

The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was:

> Do you ever just get tired of stuff? Like the dishes. You do the dishes
> then you gotta do them again and on and on and on. It's Sisyphean. not
> syphilian though that's something different. Although it would be very
> easy to get tired of syphilis too i suppose. Anyway my question is
> what would happen if goldfish grew legs

And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

} Go and observe your goldfish. If you wait long enough you'll see that
} they are growing legs.
}
} Oh, oh, look! There's one sprouting legs right now.
}
} Sorry, that's not a goldfish, it's a tadpole. It'll soon be a frog,
} awaiting the kiss of a voluptuous girl.
}
} NOT YOU, STUPID! DO NOT KISS THAT FROG!!
}
} ( * (SPROING!) )
}
} Dammit, now you've done it. You've turned a beautiful but slimy green
} frog into an ugly toad. You owe the Oracle an invitation to the
} wedding, which I shall happily decline.

Vote: (very bad) 1    2    3    4    5 (very good)


1609-03
Selected-By: Klone (aka Daniel Klein)<daniel.v.klein@gmail.com>

The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was:

> Our pastor has just renamed our church (he says it's HIS church). It is
> now The Churchh of the Appoplectic Revivial. Should I simply change to
> being Catholic? Or Jewish? Or something else? What would be best?
> Sunday approaches and I really don't want to be there.

And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

} You should start your own religion; it's what all the best people do
} (many of the worst as well).
}
} Some suggestions for making your new cult successful:
}
} 1) Make sure the rules are very specific. Nothing as general as "Do
} unto others as you have them do unto you". Try, "Give small ceramic
} frogs to people with whom you've had a minor falling out on the
} anniversary of your first meeting."
}
} 2) Introduce some penalty for non-adherents. Preferably something that
} will convince enough gullible, confirmation-bias-susceptible people
} there's something in it: If you do not follow me with enough fervour,
} you will occasionally be attacked by gulls.
}
} 3) Ensure your followers can identify themselves and anyone not inside
} the cult: Our followers always carry a ball of lavender soaked in the
} sap of three stick-insects.
}
} 4) Discover some miracles that can't be disproved easily. Anything as
} obvious as "Wanlockhead was saved from flooding by divine providence"
} when we know perfectly well that Wanlockhead is 467m above sea-level
} and had no chance of flooding in a month of Mondays is not good. Try,
} "The plague of foxes was poised to invade Borth when a
} divinely-inspired sheep dropped from a tree onto the fox-chief's
} head."
}
} 5) Surround yourself with a few close adherents: Pick the friends who
} don't know you that well. Your closest friends will just point out
} that it's Trevor spouting rubbish again. Others will be so glad to see
} you again after all these years that they'll go along with whatever
} you say for a laugh. Once you induce guilt in them, they'll stay for a
} lifetime.
}
} 5b) While we're at it, change your name. No divinely inspired leader
} was called Trevor. Find a name from a distant country (or the past)
} that sounds a bit mystic and royal and use that. Try "Ethelred Khan
} the Crown Prince of Upper Hand"
}
} 6) Create some form of ritual: Say you meet up on Tuesdays after
} pub-closing time (if the pubs don't shut before your bedtime, petition
} the council until they do), where you all don beach shorts on your
} hands and walk around on all fours reciting the last three verses of
} The Hunting of The Snark.
}
} 7) Prepare for succession. When you die (or at least stop moving),
} your followers will become disillusioned and drift away. If you want
} the cult/guilt to survive after your death, claim that the most
} fervent adherent of the inner circle will inherit the beach shorts of
} superiority and your personal copy of Alice In Wonderland. Leave each
} of these to a different person in your will and let them fight it out
} later. If you're lucky, one of them will claim to have been given
} metaphorical beach shorts, at which point we're in the realms of the
} supernatural (or at least super-disturbing naturism) and the cult is
} ripe for expansion.
}
} You owe the Oracle two ceramic frogs for not coming to Snark practice
} for the last two Tuesdays. If you don't, may you forever be losing
} pens and small change to Barry, my pet gull.

Vote: (very bad) 1    2    3    4    5 (very good)


1609-04
Selected-By: David Hemming <lightinchains@gmail.com>

The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was:

> You read my report on the Hoover Damn, which I didn't understand at
> all, as I thought it was a cursed vacuum cleaner. Now I just found out
> it has water in it. The Rainbow brand vacuum has water in it, but the
> Hoover does not. Please help me learn selective memory rewriting so I
> can be slightly less wrong.

And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

} You can fine tune your memory as follows:
}
} 1) Bring a topic to the forefront of your mind.
} 2) Very gently hit yourself on the forefront of your mind to destroy
}    the memory.
} 3) Try to remember why you hit yourself on the head in the first place.
}
} This is a technique that Zadoc has used several times, and as a result
} he no longer remembers the names of the kings and queens of England,
} the correct way to address a Duke, or exactly what spats are.
}
} You owe the Oracle a Hubert Cecil Booth, a kind of closet for people
} who wish to be forgotten.

Vote: (very bad) 1    2    3    4    5 (very good)


1609-05
Selected-By: Klone (aka Daniel Klein)<daniel.v.klein@gmail.com>

The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was:

> What is at stake here?
>
> What is the purpose of this hearing?

And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

} You're at stake, tied to it. You are hearing the peasants approaching
} with their torches and their hogsheads of very inflammable beef tallow.
} They are yelling that you forgot to grovel before me and will pay the
} price.
}
} I'll call off the peasants if you agree to owe me some good grovelling
} and four dozen new supplicants.

Vote: (very bad) 1    2    3    4    5 (very good)


1609-06
Selected-By: David Hemming <lightinchains@gmail.com>

The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was:

> I've been thinking about these new "driverless car" plans.
>
> In particular, I've been considering how they mesh with the
> manner of driving that has been used, traditionally, in Boston,
> Massachusetts, since before there were automobiles. That'll be "driving
> by intimidation" in which the rules of engagement are not unlike the
> activity of bluffing in poker. (And yes, as great-grampa told me,
> people drove their horse carriages the same way!)
>
> Some of the nuances include:
> - The big vehicle has the right of way over the smaller.
> - The faster vehicle has the right of way.
> - The uglier vehicle doesn't care what happens to it, and grabs the
>   right of way.
> - Backing up into the car behind results in a successful claim for
>   "following too closely".
> - The vehicle going the wrong way on a one-way street requires the rest
>   of the traffic to back up.
> - Right-turn on red can be taken at any time.
> - Left-turn on red and straight-ahead on red similarly.
> - When waiting at a stoplight, the "oncoming traffic" lane may be used
>   to get ahead of the nincompoop in front of you.
> - A red light is merely pink until five seconds after it turns red.
> - Anything done to cause a semi-trailer to take evasive action is
>   socially acceptable.
> - Everyone behind you is a maniac, and everyone in front of you is a
>   nincompoop.
>
> Some of these rules obviously conflict with others. In particular, some
> of them require mind-reading.
>
> How does the software in the driverless car manage such situations?

And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

}  .begin;.disregard(rules);.target(person.last.on.earth);
} .pedal.accelerate(fast);..end(human.race);.begin(a.whole.new.world);

Vote: (very bad) 1    2    3    4    5 (very good)


1609-07
Selected-By: Ian Davis

The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was:

> Please set me on the True Path of the Sepulveda of the Church of the
> Holy Epithet. With your astonishing help there will be no way I can
> avoid winning, even if I stop for lunch.
>
> Where do I go first?

And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

} I usually go to the loo before starting out. Saves embarrassing
} accidents later.
}
} Anyway, you young people are all the same these days, always wanting
} your hand holding. In my day our spiritual advisors would push us out
} of the door with a compass and an A-Z of London. If we made it out of
} Milton Keynes before being set upon by witches, we were doing well.
}
} So, let's check you've got everything you need.
}
} 1) Crucifix (a Screwfix loyalty card is *not* the same thing, although
}    being stabbed through the throat by the business end of a Black &
}    Decker Hammer Drill will slow down even the most blood-thirsty
}    vampire).
}
} 2) Holy water (still, not sparkling - if Our Lord's personality was
}    ever described, "effervescent" is not an appropriate word).
}
} 3) Money (I know St Pauline (of the Pauline epistles) said something
}    about it being the root of all evil, but you try buying food with
}    just a winning personality and a smile, and you'll find yourself
}    feeding the fishes, and I don't mean at Jack McHardy's Discount Pet
}    Store).
}
} 4) Map (preferably not the Mappa Mundi; its attention to detail could
}    best be described as "distracted". A 1:25,000 scale Ordnance Survey
}    will suffice).
}
} If you've got all that, then just go out of the door, and turn
} widdershins.
}
} Left, you idiot! Left!
}
} You owe the Oracle a version of Google Maps that marks dens of
} iniquity (so that I can avoid them, obviously).

Vote: (very bad) 1    2    3    4    5 (very good)


1609-08
Selected-By: David Hemming <lightinchains@gmail.com>

The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was:

> I have a couple of maybe-serious questions about God, the Big-G God,
> who as we have heard is even more omniscient than you the Omniscient
> Oracle.
>
> First, does God kneel when He prays? To whom? In which direction does
> he possibly kneel?
>
> Also, according to Bishop Berkeley we are merely thought in the Mind of
> God. What are the best ways for reading His Ineffable Mind?

And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

} I appreciate the grovel, but although I am extraordinarily wise, I am
} not quite omniscient.  God, however, is omniscient, except on alternate
} Tuesdays.
}
} When God preys, he kneels before his prey to reach it better.  Facing
} the prey, of course.
}
} Bishop Berkeley - or that old Berk, as I like to call him - didn't know
} what he was talking about.  How can we be mere thought in the mind of
} God? God's mind, as you noted, is ineffable, whereas lots of us are
} effed all the time.  (Not you, Supplicant, I know; but your day will
} come.)  So we must have existence outside of God's mind.
}
} You owe the Oracle a god of your own making.

Vote: (very bad) 1    2    3    4    5 (very good)


1609-09
Selected-By: Klone (aka Daniel Klein)<daniel.v.klein@gmail.com>

The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was:

> My paper on the founder of thermodynamics Sadi Carnot and his so-called
> Carnot Cycle suffered greatly from the corrections that my inept
> brother applied. I just wanted him to check my spelling and grammar,
> but he thought he was a know-it-all and he tried to improve everything.
>
> Instead of thermodynamics, the paper I allowed my brother to hand in
> for me was all about the impossibility of bicycling, and was titled,
> "Sadly Cannot Cycle".
>
> This is yet another in the series of complaints I have made to you on
> the difficulties I have with grammar, spelling, the English language,
> the French language, French people, computers, lack of computers,
> oxymorons, time travel, Mexican jails, over-stretched puns, Donald
> Knuth, poor Oracular answers, Perl programming, Evita Peron, database
> inconsistencies, typographical errors, idiots, and my brother. You have
> occasionally taken to ZOTting me, as if that would solve the problem.
>
> Please instead give me a general solution to ALL problems. You came
> close to a good solution nearly a year ago, when you recommended a
> solution of about 40 percent ethanol in water, plus enough French
> flavoring to qualify as slightly genuine cognac. Unfortunately I used
> it up over a month ago.
>
> While you are busy putting together an answer, send more cognac,
> please.
>
> And if you don't get me more cognac I'll drink bathtub gin and start
> asking you whether "cannot" or "can not" is the correct usage. Do not
> take this as a threat, even if it is.

And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

} This incarnation of the Oracle notes with pleasure that although you
} have difficulties with both the French language and its people, you
} only have problems with English as a language.
}
} The general solution is therefore simple:
}
} Construct your own reality, then either retreat into it, or impose it
} on everyone else.
}
} The English have of course been doing this for years. After having
} created the English myth of King Arthur defeating the Welsh at
} Agincourt by building Hard Ian's wall across Watford Gap, they all
} retreated into the Home and Away Counties, as well as the various
} Shires (horses, books, and what Sean Connery used to call knights).
} Having rewritten the history books in their favour (started by the
} disgustingly Venereal Bead), they started to run out of space and
} imagination, and wondered what might lie beyond the English Chanel No.
} 4 (slightly less fragrant than Chanel No. 5 due to the existence of
} French fishing vessels).
}
} The English therefore started sailing the Seven Seas (they tried
} selling them at first but couldn't find anyone willing to buy several
} billion pints of salty fishy water that the French had been sailing
} in). They roamed far and wide and graciously imposed their version of
} reality on the inhabitants of the far-off lands they discovered
} (ignoring the fact that the people living there didn't want to be
} discovered, thank you very much).
}
} Skipping quickly over some of the English's more questionable
} practices such as looking after other countries' ancient artefacts for
} them, we come to the present day, where the English myth is starting
} to lose its grip on reality, in spite of (or possibly because of) its
} efforts via the World Service and Giles Brandreth's appearances on
} Just a Minute.
}
} The only way that the English can claim to have retained their current
} grip on reality is by drinking themselves into oblivion (not the one
} at Alton Towers). Given that the English cannot buy Champagne (either
} the drink or the French region) easily, they turn to Bucks-Fizz (which
} underwent rebranding following the resignation of the Revd Dr Spooner
} from the Board of Directors).
}
} It should be noted that bathtub gin is a bad idea if someone takes the
} plug out. With Thames Water's current record, the gin will reach the
} Channel and beer-battered cod will become gin-flavoured mackerel,
} which nobody wants.
}
} So, the solution is simple: ferment your own English wine and start
} drinking every day before the sun is over the yardarm.
}
} You owe the Oracle one for the Great North Road.

Vote: (very bad) 1    2    3    4    5 (very good)


1609-10
Selected-By: Mark Lawrence <mtlrph@gmail.com>

The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was:

> How are we to understand or misinterpret the words "vowels" and
> "wolves" when neither is a palindrome of the other? When will the
> truth (or at least the half-truth) reappear, but without yesterday's
> "wise guy" remarks?

And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

} Wolves: Evolutionarily well-adapted predators that add a certain
} je-ne-sais-quoi to any solo trip through a dark forest.
} Vowels: Evolved to help humans pronounce words without drowning in
} their own spit.
}
} Counterpoint:
} Humans: Evolutionarily sophisticated predators capable of producing
} the Works of Shakespeare and Bach's Mass in B Minor.
} Consonants: Add interest and complexity to language. Make the
} difference between vowel and bowel.
}
} The conjunctions of these are very insidious, though:
} Werewolves: Are they human, are they a wolf? Changes according to the
} phase of the moon. Capable of appearing suave and genteel one moment,
} then disembowelling you 10 seconds later.
}
} The letter Y: Is it a vowel, is it a consonant? No-one knows.
} According to the word "syzygy" it must be a vowel. According to the
} word "yeti" it must be a consonant. Also well known for being
} annoying from small children: "Why can't I have another biscuit?,
} "Why is the sky green", "Why won't you answer my questions?"
}
} So, beware "Y" and werewolves with equal vigour, lest you be taken
} unawares.
}
} You owe the Oracle some rhythm.

Vote: (very bad) 1    2    3    4    5 (very good)


Username:
Password:

© Copyright 1989-2024 The Internet OracleTM a Kinzler.com offering Contact oracle-web@internetoracle.org