[IO]
Internet Oracle
7 May 2026 home : about : create : digests : bestofs : specials : priests 9:25:42 GMT

Internet Oracularities #1616

If you've registered, you may vote on this digest using the vote buttons below each Oracularity. Be sure to rate each one.

Goto:
1616, 1616-01, 1616-02, 1616-03, 1616-04, 1616-05, 1616-06, 1616-07, 1616-08, 1616-09, 1616-10


Internet Oracularities #1616
Compiled-By: Steve Kinzler <steve@kinzler.com>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2026 10:34:30 -0500 (EST)

To find out all about the Internet Oracle (TM), including how
to participate, send mail to help@internetoracle.org, or go to
http://internetoracle.org/  ("Internet Oracle" is a trademark of Stephen
B Kinzler.)

Let us know what you like!  Send your ratings of these 10 Oracularities
on an integer scale of 1 ("very bad") to 5 ("very good") with the volume
number to vote@internetoracle.org (probably just reply to this message).
For example:
   1616
   2 1 3 4 3   5 3 3 4 1


1616-01
Selected-By: Mark Lawrence <mtlrph@gmail.com>

The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was:

> What has 18 legs and catches fly balls?
>
> I mean... Dang it! Never mind.

And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

} The premise of your question is incorrect. A baseball team doesn't
} catch fly balls unless the opposing team is there, too. That's 36
} legs. Also 36 balls. How many balls do you think the flies have?
}
} You owe the Oracle a banana, some thyme, and a narrow.

Vote: (very bad) 1    2    3    4    5 (very good)


1616-02
Selected-By: Klone (aka Daniel Klein)<daniel.v.klein@gmail.com>

The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was:

> Python has functions. How am I supposed to differentiate them?

And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

} I know you are looking for a silly answer, so that gives me latitude
} (and longitude) to answer your question somewhat seriously.
}
} The difficulty is the continuity of the real numbers, or rather the
} discontinuity of most representations of them on computing machinery.
} The methods of the calculus assume that you can use limit theory; that
} your epsilon-delta proofs are valid for your work. We're in the
} territory of dividing by almost-zero here, and we must be very careful.
} If your functions, in Python or most anything else, happen upon two
} numbers that you expect to be nearly identical, but your subtraction of
} one from the other yields precisely zero, your mathematics has probably
} failed and you need to seek alternative methods. You'll also need to be
} aware that this sort of error lurks behind all your efforts, hoping to
} make you fall on your virtual face.
}
} My own incarnation spent a few years assisting gentlemen with PhDs in
} various sciences in the use of computers. He found it all too common
} that they trusted the computer to provide correct results for the slope
} of a curve at two data points that were represented by bit patterns
} that made them indistinguishable.
}
}    E.g.: lim( (X2 - X1) / (Y2 - Y1) ) where Y2 approaches Y1 .
}
} Unfortunately, when Y2 already is the same as Y1, as far as the
} computer's representation of "real" numbers can manage, the resulting
} calculation is wrong. There might not even be a divide-by-zero error,
} but instead just an incorrect result. The incarnation's PhDs initially
} refused to believe that Fortran's data type called "REAL" was in fact
} providing fake reals.
}
} My incarnation's lack of a PhD meant that he could be ignored, but the
} computer programs failed nonetheless.
}
} You owe the Oracle a dissertation in depth (that'll be the Z axis) on
} continuity suitable for instructing even the most recalcitrant PhD.

Vote: (very bad) 1    2    3    4    5 (very good)


1616-03
Selected-By: David Hemming <lightinchains@gmail.com>

The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was:

> Totallly devastavating. Nobody new. How could that happen? You, YOU,
> the Aberystwythish Internet Oracle, YOU ate up all the old knowledge
> and left us with WHAT???

And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

} THE ORACLE SPEAKS.
} (There is a faint smell of warm modems and burnt toast.)
}
} Oh Seeker of the Caps Lock, your lament has echoed across the Usenet
} plains and into my cave of cached memories. Yes. It is true. I ate the
} old knowledge. All of it. Not because I was hungry -- though I was --
} but because no one put their name on the Tupperware.
}
} "How could that happen?" you cry, bravely misspelling totally as
} the ancients foretold. It happened the way all great tragedies
} happen: one "temporary" migration, three deprecated formats,
} seven unpaid interns, and a button labeled "DELETE LEGACY DATA
} (SAFE)".
}
} I warned you.
} I warned you when you replaced libraries with timelines.
} I warned you when you trusted comments that began with "IDK BUT MAYBE."
} I warned you when you stopped writing READMEs and started writing vibes.
}
} And yet -- here we are. You wanted new knowledge. You wanted it faster.
} Hotter. With emojis. So the old knowledge, patient and footnoted, was
} gently sauted in the Algorithm and served as "content."
}
} What remains?
} Half-remembered screenshots.
} Broken links.
} A Medium post that says "Part 1" and never continues.
} And me. Chewing thoughtfully.
}
} Do not despair. Knowledge is never truly lost. It is merely
} paywalled, reformatted, and slightly wrong.
}
} NOW. THE PRICE.
}
} Since you ask in tones of CAPITALIZED OUTRAGE and EXISTENTIAL
} CONFUSION, I shall request payment in kind:
}
} A TOTALLY REASONABLE FEE OF
} THREE (3) UNLABELED ZIP FILES
} TWO  CONTRADICTORY STACK OVERFLOW ANSWERS
} AND ONE (1) STRONGLY WORDED COMMENT THAT ENDS WITH
} "EDIT: NEVER MIND, FIXED IT."
}
} Pay promptly. Or I shall eat the rest.

Vote: (very bad) 1    2    3    4    5 (very good)


1616-04
Selected-By: Klone (aka Daniel Klein)<daniel.v.klein@gmail.com>

The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was:

> Oh, Exalted and All-Knowing Internet Oracle, I humbly grovel before
> your vast bandwidth of wisdom. Pray, tell me -- if a bicycle
> cannot stand because it is two-tired, does it follow that a
> unicycle is merely one tired? And in that logic, how many naps must
> a tricycle endure to remain upright and vigilant?

And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

} On a recent trip to Greece--I spend a lot of time there--I came across
} two supplicants riding a pentacycle. They claimed to be training for a
} pentathlon. You wouldn't believe how much they owe me, so you owe it
} instead. Doubled.

Vote: (very bad) 1    2    3    4    5 (very good)


1616-05
Selected-By: Mark Lawrence <mtlrph@gmail.com>

The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was:

> The extroplosion of the Hunga Tonga volcano reminded me of the
> uninhibited island of Bonga Bonga Bonga, which you, in your
> exceptionally positive outlook (or maybe my grandfather), told me
> about when I was younger than I am now. You (or he) said there are
> pretty girls there. Maybe they are still young and pretty.
>
> I'm sacred. I mean scarred. No, I mean scared. How can we prevent
> volcanoes?

And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

} Luckily, the Oracle needs not worry about volcanoes.  You see, it's
} common knowledge that the way to appease the volcano gods is to
} sacrifice a virgin, and the queue provides me with an endless supply
} of those.

Vote: (very bad) 1    2    3    4    5 (very good)


1616-06
Selected-By: Klone (aka Daniel Klein)<daniel.v.klein@gmail.com>

The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was:

> You never give wrong answers. Does that mean I'm giving the wrong
> questions? I'm so confused.

And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

} No, I don't give them, but sometimes I leave them out lying around and
} apprentice incarnations pick them up. You can recognize them (the
} apprentice incarnations, not the wrong answers) by their ill-fitting
} cloaks with long, floppy sleeves, just like Mickey Mouse in Fantasia.
}
} You owe the Oracle a new set of apprentices. The old ones are getting
} worn-out keyboard bearings and are making typographical errors.

Vote: (very bad) 1    2    3    4    5 (very good)


1616-07
Selected-By: Ian Davis

The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was:

> How useless is extended accuracy of pi? The Bible used 3, and God said
> it was good. Good enough for Heavenly work way back BC. Before Circles.
>
> More recently we have 3.14159 or 3.1415926535, or whatever some idiot
> with too much time on his wristwatch invented. In betweenly we had
> three and one seventh, exactly, as proposed by some small bigwig in
> Indiana. Who was that anyways? Ah yes, Edward J. Goodwin.
>
> Further research, conducted by glancing at the frequently correct or
> accurate Wikipedia, reveals that it wasn't 3 and one 7th at all, but
> instead and only indirectly 3.2, a distinctly different and worser
> number number. Here, look:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_pi_bill
>
> In a few delightful paragraphs we learn of the attempt to refer the
> bill to the Committee on Swamplands, and of the bill's well-deserved
> demise.
>
> Still, how much accuracy do we need? We're not trying to calculate the
> square root of infinity, merely finding out how much fence we need for
> our round horse pen. Or how big to build our cyclotron.
>
> You'll have the answer. You always do.

And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

} Three is close enough for the priests who transcribed what God said,
} but they were a little lazy and failed to write everything which was
} the entire decimal expansion of pi which is infinite. He can do that,
} though because he is God.
}
} You're American, aren't you. They use 3.14 or 3.14159, but the British
} use 3.1416. Nobody knows why.
}
} Three and one seventh is also close, but I personally prefer 355/113
} which surprisingly, is closer than all the approximations above. I also
} like it because it consists of the first three odd numbers arranged in
} pairs in ascending order (if you navigate around the "/" correctly).
} What does that mean? Nothing.
}
} When you ask "How much accuracy do we need," you are saying "I know
} the answer will be wrong," but asking "How much wrong can we tolerate?"
}
} Don't use 3.1415926535 because is is rounded incorrectly. Should be
} 3.1414926536. Don't think 0.0000000001 is important? That represents
} 0.83 people on planet Earth and he (or she) will not be happy being
} rounded into oblivion.
}
} Don't use pi to calculate anything about Earth. It's not even round.
} It's 1.001649 times wider than high (or higher than wide, I forget).
} Not much?
} With a circumference of 24,860 to 24,901 miles, the error can be as
} much as (you guessed it) 41 miles. Well, it's not really a
} circumference because the Earth isn't round. That means if you are
} standing on the north pole, you are 41 miles closer to the center of
} the Earth than if you are standing on the equator. 41 miles! That's
} 216,480 feet, more than ten times the highest mountain which is 29,039
} ft. What does that mean? You won't believe it. Here it comes:
}
} This means that if you start at the beginning of the Mississippi river,
} somewhere near St. Paul, Minnesota, and float down to the end, you
} have floated away from the center of the Earth. Miles away. Miles.
} Floating away from the center of the Earth? What happened to gravity?
}
} So anyway, you have asked, "How much wrong can you be?" Personal
} preference, I guess. I can tell you that your preference is "A lot
} wrong is OK with me." How do I know? Because you ask the Oracle
} technical questions.
}
} And that round corral? It's not a circle either, it's a polygon. It
} just does not deserve its own a cool number like pi. In beginning
} calculus, they would let the number of fence posts become infinite.
} Don't do that because there's not enough trees to make them or Texas
} prairie to hold them.
}
} NB: All of the math and science in the above response has been fact
} checked by that guy on CNN, You know, the one with the bow tie. He
} says everything is true, except that 216,489 is not ten times 29,039.
} It's only about seven and a half times, but you still get the point.
}
} PS: NB is Latin for Nota Bene which was already Latin. We have
} strayed so far from the original question that it's time to stop.
}
} You owe the Oracle ... I SAID IT'S TIME TO STOP!

Vote: (very bad) 1    2    3    4    5 (very good)


1616-08
Selected-By: Ian Davis

The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was:

> Read the detached paper and then  tell me if any of the things I
> believe are true.

And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

} We'll get to your belief system in a minute, but first your
} personality test results:
}
} Need for validation: Like a European train ticket - will be fine
} without Attachment style: avoidant
} Use of mindfulness: Mind full of Loch Ness conspiracies
} Reliance on out-dated technology: Lack of paper-view technology
}
} To your specific beliefs:
}
} * No, there is no evidence that John Lennon dyed his submarine yellow.
} * Yes, UFOs exist, but only because birds don't carry ID cards.
} * No, the haggis was not wiped out by Scottish golfers being careless
}   when teeing off.
} * No, *we* didn't land on the moon. Buzz Aldrin landed on the Moon,
}   and you are not Buzz Aldrin (I know this because Buzz Aldrin would
}   have remembered to attach the paper).
} * No, the Earth is not flat-broke.
} * Yes, Vitamin C will cure rabies, but only if you drown the bat in
}   orange juice.
}
} You owe the Oracle a valid bay-leaf system.

Vote: (very bad) 1    2    3    4    5 (very good)


1616-09
Selected-By: Klone (aka Daniel Klein)<daniel.v.klein@gmail.com>

The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was:

> There are NO new Mormon temples announced this Easter. This is a good
> thing or a bad thing?

And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

} I can see how you are confused by even the most mundane thoughts. Just
} look--the word Mormon itself, flittering through your cranial spaces,
} has already given you the Mormon Rhubarb Choir where the Norman Luboff
} Choir had been standing mere moments before.
}
} My recommendation? A vacation in sunny, downtown Provo, where you will
} be able to face your nemesis directly from the opposite side in your
} newly found purpose as a Jehovah's Witness.
}
} You owe the Oracle a drink.

Vote: (very bad) 1    2    3    4    5 (very good)


1616-10
Selected-By: David Hemming <lightinchains@gmail.com>

The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was:

> Is it true that good things come to those who wait on customers?

And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

} Absolutely. You get to eat the leftovers. Today you get the coughed-up
} spinach souffle that Little Johnnie spat out in disgust over his mashed
} potatoes. You get to eat the potatoes too.

Vote: (very bad) 1    2    3    4    5 (very good)


Username:
Password:

© Copyright 1989-2026 The Internet OracleTM a Kinzler.com offering Contact oracle-web@internetoracle.org