> Oh most absolute, admirable, astute, august, authoritative,
> celebrated, celestial, charismatic, diligent, distinguished, divine,
> dominant, eminent, erudite, everlasting, execptional, extraordinary,
> famous, grand, great, heavenly, immortal, ineffable, infinite,
> influential, majestic, mighty, noble, omnipotent, omnipresent,
> omniscient, outstanding, perspicacoius, powerful, prestigious,
> profound, remarkable, renound, respected, sagacious, shrewd, sublime,
> superior, supreme and wise Oracle,
>
> A while back I asked you that question again, and gave three
> conditions. You replied with a few other conditions that I was not
> aware of. For this, I thank you. But my question still remains
> unanswered. So, I will put it to you again:
>
> Oh Oracle, how much wood could a woodchuck chuck if:
>
> a) the woodchuck were capable of chucking wood (of course), AND
> b) said woodchuck were capable of chucking wood for hours on end, AND
> c) said woodchuck were given a time limit of three hours?
> d) the set of all woodchucks is non-empty
> e) the set of wood is non-empty
> f) the set of unchucked wood is always non-empty
> g) the intersection of the set of wood and the set of woodchucks
> is empty
> h) wood is capable of being chucked
> i) wood that has been chucked remains chucked
> j) wood does not spontaneously become chucked
> k) wood cannot be simultaneously chucked and unchucked
> l) it is possible to distinguish chucked from unchucked wood
> m) there is a physical measurement for the rate of woodchucking
> n) the rate of wood chucking is constant
> o) the amount of wood that has been chucked is a linear function
> of the rate of chucking
>
> I await your most illuminating reply.
|